I absolutely love to read. My library is overflowing with books and until we move to a larger house, all new books will end up either on the floor or sloppily stacked on top of other books.
Despite my love of reading, there are some things that I simply hate about books. I've read enough books to know the kinds of books that will be a good read, and ones that will get on my nerves.
Here are 10 things I hate about books:
Chapters are logical places to stop and put down a book for the day. If you're like me, you usually don't like to have to stop reading a book mid-way through a chapter and continue reading it the next day.I like books with smaller, shorter chapters because it gives me lots of logical places I can put down a book.
What I really hate are books that consistently have really really long chapters.
Sometimes I sit there reading a book and I tell myself that I'll read for about 5 more minutes or until the current chapter is done...30 minutes later, I'm still struggling to try to finish reading the chapter.
I understand the need for a book to grab your attention visually, but do they really have to make some books in such awkward sizes?I'm talking about books that are too tall or books that are too long to fit normally on a bookshelf.
My bookshelf has become a complete mess because of these kinds of books - with various titles jutting out from the bookshelves while others I've had to shelve horizontally instead of vertically.
I also find that these awkward sized books are just downright difficult to handle when reading them. If the book were tall, I sometimes have difficulty keeping them open. If the book were too wide, I often have difficulty turning the pages.
When I mean fluff, I mean all that stuff that is written at the beginning of the book (but before the book itself).I'm talking about Acknowledgments, Foreword, How To Use This Book, About The Author, Dedications, Rave Reviews, Preface, Introduction, and on and on and on...
Sometimes I felt as though I've read an entire book before I even start reading the actual book itself.
Yes, yes, I know - I understand the need to give thanks and dedications and for the need to explain a few things about the book before you read it and all....
But honestly, if I had just finished reading a book that I thought was one of the best books I've ever read, THEN I would probably want to read about things like reviews by other authors and those who should be acknowledged in the making of the book and who it was dedicated to.
There have been many times I simply said to myself "Who cares?" when going through all that "pre-book" fluff because I don't even know if the book I'm about to read will be any good at all.
Again, honestly - a lot of that stuff should be put at the back of the book because if I liked the book, I'm more willing to read it AFTER I've finished reading the book.
Sometimes I'm there reading and I see that a graph/diagram/table is coming up and as I get closer and closer to it, I start thinking "Ok, are we going to mention what that graph is all about?".Then I keep reading and reading until I finally get to the graph with no mention of it whatsoever.
At this point, a number of thoughts go through my head...
"Should I read and understand this graph?"
"Should I just continue reading and skip over the graph and hopefully it will eventually be mentioned?"
"Did I miss a reference to it or something...maybe on a previous page somewhere?"
The worst is when the book has a lengthy analysis about the graph/diagram/table...and it's on the next page or previous page! I then find myself having to flip back and forth...reading what the book is telling me and going back (or forward) to the graph/diagram/table that it wants to explain.
Some things only take a page to explain and some topics can be understood by the general public very quickly....But when you take an entire chapter to explain something very simple, it tells me that the author had little in the way of a book and is now trying to stretch every little basic detail he/she can in order to make it appear like a book.
What's worse is that I sometimes have seen whole sections (several chapters) dedicated to explaining the simplest of things.
You know when an author is beating a topic to death when you begin seeing the same sentences being repeated over and over again.
Sometimes I look at the table of contents and think "Wow! There's going to be a lot of information in that chapter". But when I go and actually read the chapter, it's only 4 pages long!The table of contents listed almost every single sub heading in the chapter to make it seem like there was a lot of content, when in reality, there wasn't. Then when you take a closer look at the table of contents, 4 or 5 topics are listed on the same page!
I see this a lot in trading books. Usually when you see a book that dedicates a lot of the book on the basics, you know that the author really didn't have a great idea for a book (either that or they just published the book just for a quick money grab).If it's a book about trading, please don't spend 2/3 of the book reviewing what trends are, what a chart looks like, and what "going long" and "going short" means.
I tell you, at least 80% of the trading books available out there are not worth buying because of this.
So you get this great book that you eagerly want to read and you think you can go read it in public, but what if the cover art is deemed somewhat inappropriate or cover art that doesn't really depict what the book is about?I've seen books about economics or trading that look more like romance novels and I've seen biographies look like cookbooks.
The book itself might be about something mundane, but if it's got an awkward or inappropriate cover art, I sometimes feel almost embarrassed to read it in public!
I have read books that make use of so many footnotes that I sometimes wonder if half the book were footnotes!I can understand the need to cite sources, but to be honest, I really don't want to read what the footnotes have to say because it breaks the flow of my reading.
Put them in the back of the book, then OK, I don't mind, but when you have half the page dedicated to footnotes, I don't know how a reader can focus on the book itself.
There are some self help books that have worksheets or fill-in-the-blank type pages, but whenever I encounter them, what do I do most of the time?I end up not filling it out nor do I take the time to actually do the exercise shown in the book.
Why?
It's usually because I know at some point in the future I may want to read the book again and by filling in the worksheets, it spoils my future reads (my goals or my opinions may have changed). Not only that, but if I ever need to get rid of the book or if I need to downsize my library, I may have to sell the book or donate it.
Another reason why I don't usually do the exercises listed in these books is because I'm usually reading it in bed where I don't have access to a computer and/or paper and pen.
Sometimes I see pages and pages of fill-in-the-blanks in these kinds of books and I often wonder if that is the author's way of making a book seem longer than it actually is.








































